Legal Opinion
Nestle Food Co. v. Crews
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 18, 2000No. 92,858PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
11 The issue presented on certiorari is whether the statute-based district court claim brought against the tortfeasor's insurer by the employer and its workers' compensation carrier was erroneously dismissed as time-barred. We answer in the affirmative. '
[[Image here]]
ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
T2 In an action by Nestle Food Company (Employer or Nestle) and its workers' compensation carrier, Constitution State Service Company (CSSC), against the insurer of a third-party tortfeasor, American States Insurance Company (tortfeasor's insurer, ASIC) and against the claimant-employee, 2 the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- May v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Nicholas v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Kinslow Round-Up Inc. v. City of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- In Re De-Annexation of Certain Real PropertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Gibson v. CopelandCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.