Legal Opinion
SWEETEN v. LAWSON
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 19, 2017No. Case 114,992PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DEBORAH B. BARNES, PRESIDING JUDGE:
¶ 1 In this replevin action, Plaintiff Flo Sweeten (Sweeten) appeals from the trial court’s Order denying her motion for new trial following the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendants Kyle Lawson (Lawson) and the Town of Gene Autry (the Town) (collectively, Defendants). Based on our review, we conclude Sweeten’s replevin action does not fall within the scope of the Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act (GTCA). 1 Furthermore, we conclude the trial court erred in denying Sweeten’s request for prejudgment delivery. Finally, a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Fanning v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 363, State Question No. 672Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Glasco v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- ABERCROMBIE & FITCH STORES INC. v. PENN SQUARE MALL LIMITED PARTNERSHIPCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- BULARD AIR SERVICES v. BROWN AVIATIONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019
- HELM v. BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ROGERS COUNTYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019
- HELM v. BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ROGERS COUNTYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019
- SWEETEN v. LAWSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.