Legal Opinion
Shanbour v. Hollingsworth
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 28, 1996No. 83220PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMA WILSON, Chief Justice.
The first impression issue is whether the 180-day time period for filing a governmental tort claims action may be extended for excusable neglect pursuant to 12 O.S.1991, § 2006(B)(2). We hold that the provisions in 12 O.S.1991, § 2206(B)(2) are not applicable to extend the 180-day time period for filing a governmental tort claims action in 51 O.S. 1991, § 157(B).
On January 14, 1993, appellant, Carol Shanbour, was driving southbound on Tinker Diagonal in Midwest City when a snowplow, operated by an employee of the Department of Transportation, Robert T.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MBA Commercial Construction, Inc. v. Roy J. Hannaford Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Reirdon v. Wilburton Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Cruse v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Horinek v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
3Cited by36 opinions
- HALL v. THE GEO GROUP, INCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Harmon v. CradduckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Carswell v. Oklahoma State UniversitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- GRISHAM v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- I. T. K. v. MOUNDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.