Legal Opinion

Lee Wayne Company, Inc. v. Pruitt

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 20, 1976No. 48797PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Presiding Judge:

Do the relaxed rules of pleading and evidence in a small claims procedure permit a plaintiff to recover on the basis of an affidavit and other evidence that is not authenticated by a witness?

The plaintiff, Lee Wayne Company, Inc., a foreign corporation, filed an action on the small claim docket to recover $140.83 from the defendant, Bill Pruitt, for “breach of contract for payment of money . . . .” The trial, postponed twice, was held on July 23, 1975. No witnesses were subpoenaed or sworn and neither party appeared personally, both making appearance by counsel.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Denver Symphony Ass'n v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Smith v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Black v. LittletonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Maloy v. GriffithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  5. Drakos v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Patterson v. BeallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Gibson v. CopelandCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. McIntosh v. Limestone National BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Patterson v. BeallCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Jackson v. ScottCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API