Lee Wayne Company, Inc. v. Pruitt
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Presiding Judge:
Do the relaxed rules of pleading and evidence in a small claims procedure permit a plaintiff to recover on the basis of an affidavit and other evidence that is not authenticated by a witness?
The plaintiff, Lee Wayne Company, Inc., a foreign corporation, filed an action on the small claim docket to recover $140.83 from the defendant, Bill Pruitt, for “breach of contract for payment of money . . . .” The trial, postponed twice, was held on July 23, 1975. No witnesses were subpoenaed or sworn and neither party appeared personally, both making appearance by counsel.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Denver Symphony Ass'n v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- Smith v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Black v. LittletonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Maloy v. GriffithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Drakos v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Patterson v. BeallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Gibson v. CopelandCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- McIntosh v. Limestone National BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Patterson v. BeallCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- Jackson v. ScottCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.