Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Callahan

California Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 12925PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Action by plaintiffs, as successors in interest of certain lessors in a conveyance known as an oil and gas lease, to compel the assignee of the lessee thereunder to comply with a covenant therein to keep the premises free from liens arising from drilling and producing operations under said instrument. The question arose by the sustaining of respondent’s demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. The facts, therefore, are not in dispute and the single proposition is presented as to whether the rules of equity will authorize relief. The prayer of the complaint is for damages, it is true,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. People v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Graciosa Oil Co. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Wayt v. PateeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Carlson v. LindauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. MinnetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. MacDonald Properties, Inc. v. Bel-Air Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Russell v. Palos Verdes PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API