In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Merkel
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating the Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DR) 7-110(B) (prohibiting ex parte communication with court on merits of pending case) and DR 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation).1 A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused had violated DR 1-102(A)(3), but not DR 7-110(B), and imposed a public reprimand as a sanction. The accused sought review, arguing that he had not violated DR 1-102(A)(3). The Bar maintains that he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re NisleyOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MarandasOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- In re Gregory Mark AbelOregon Supreme Court · 2025
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MerkelOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- In re Gregory Mark AbelOregon Supreme Court · 2025