Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Merkel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2006No. OSB 04-154; S52856PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating the Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DR) 7-110(B) (prohibiting ex parte communication with court on merits of pending case) and DR 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation).1 A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused had violated DR 1-102(A)(3), but not DR 7-110(B), and imposed a public reprimand as a sanction. The accused sought review, arguing that he had not violated DR 1-102(A)(3). The Bar maintains that he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re NisleyOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MarandasOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re Gregory Mark AbelOregon Supreme Court · 2025
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MerkelOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In re Gregory Mark AbelOregon Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API