Legal Opinion
Monroe v. Williams
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 15, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-1717(RCL)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff originally brought this action pro se, seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. After the Court’s appointment of counsel to represent plaintiff, plaintiff now seeks, in an amended complaint, to delete his causes of action under Title VII and the Age Act, and instead ground his action on 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Massarsky v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Robert James Richards v. Milton Stanley Mileski (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Andrew F. Glick v. Jerome KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Long v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Crist v. Republic of TurkeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GardnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Yager v. CareyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Price v. Phoenix Home Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.