Legal Opinion
Price v. Phoenix Home Life Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 22, 1999No. CIV.A.98-1667RMUPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendants Phoenix and MetLife’s Motions to Dismiss the Complaint and Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the motions of Defendants Phoenix Home Life Mutual (“Phoenix”) and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s (“MetLife”) to dismiss and on the plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint. The court grants the motions to dismiss due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The court denies the motion to amend the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shekoyan v. Sibley International Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Bush v. ButlerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Green Ex Rel. SG v. StuyvesantDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- National Wrestling Coaches Ass'n v. United States Department of EducationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Buesgens v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.