Legal Opinion
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Gardner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 30, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-2226 (CRR)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment on the statute of limitations defense raised as to certain claims, and the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint in the above-captioned case. The Court has carefully considered the submissions of the parties, the applicable law, and the entire record herein, and concludes that the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint must be granted. The Court also finds that the statute of limitations in this case was tolled under the equitable doctrine of adverse domination.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- West v. ConrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Iit, An International Investment Trust v. Bernard CornfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Alberts v. Tuft (In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp. I)District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. ScalettyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.