Legal Opinion

Wheatley v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 13281PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This matter comes to us upon a petition for a writ of review to determine the legality of the findings and judgment and other proceedings leading up to the formation of the proposed Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District, which matter has been determined by the defendant Superior Court contrary to the contentions of petitioner.

Petitioner is a resident, freeholder, taxpayer and elector of the county of Napa, California, and as such filed a protest against the formation of the proposed Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District and the inclusion of his lands within said district.

The proceedings…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Imperial Water Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  3. Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Midway School District v. GriffeathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. LuehringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API