Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Premo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 27, 2016No. 10C22490; A156063PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court, without holding a hearing, dismissed the petition with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Petitioner appealed the trial court’s judgment, arguing that the trial court erred in (1) dismissing his petition for failure to state a claim and (2) in dismissing the petition with prejudice. See ORS 138.525(4) ("A dismissal is without prejudice if a mer-itless petition is dismissed without a hearing and the petitioner was not represented by counsel.”); Ware v. Hall, 342 Or 444, 453, 154 P3d 118 (2007) (“[NJothing suggests…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Young v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ware v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Pedroso v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. PremoMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. Dillard v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Childs v. AmsberryDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  4. Dillard v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Dillard v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API