Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Baldwin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2009No. USDC CV 02-1565-ALA; USCA 06-35635; SC S055187PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

This case is before this court on a certified question of Oregon law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Farmer v. Baldwin, 497 F3d 1050 (9th Cir 2007). Under federal law, a petitioner generally may not obtain a writ of habeas corpus without first exhausting the remedies available to him in state court. 28 USC § 2254(b)(1)(A). 1 To exhaust those remedies, the petitioner “must fairly present his claims in each appropriate state court,” in a manner that would “[alert] that court to the federal nature of the claim.” Farmer, 497 F3d at 1053 (internal quotation marks…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Eric Allen Peterson v. Robert LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Farmer v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. State v. BAKER/JAYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. HyltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Walton v. HillDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API