Farmer v. Baldwin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
This case is before this court on a certified question of Oregon law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Farmer v. Baldwin, 497 F3d 1050 (9th Cir 2007). Under federal law, a petitioner generally may not obtain a writ of habeas corpus without first exhausting the remedies available to him in state court. 28 USC § 2254(b)(1)(A). 1 To exhaust those remedies, the petitioner “must fairly present his claims in each appropriate state court,” in a manner that would “[alert] that court to the federal nature of the claim.” Farmer, 497 F3d at 1053 (internal quotation marks…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Eric Allen Peterson v. Robert LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lambert v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Farmer v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- State v. BAKER/JAYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. HyltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Walton v. HillDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.