Legal Opinion

Bobo v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2005No. CC 01C-15710; CA A120098; SC S51565PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

This case presents primarily two questions. The first is whether, by retroactively transferring Medicaid Upper Payment Limit Funds (Medicaid funds) out of the General Fund, Senate Bill (SB) 963 (2001) reduced the amount of money that the General Fund received for the 1999-2001 biennium and also the amount of a statutory tax refund, popularly known as the “kicker.” The second is whether, if that were the effect of SB 963, the Oregon Constitution required that that bill originate in the House of Representatives and pass by a three-fifths vote. We hold that the legislature understood that SB 963…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Northern Counties Trust v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API