Ogle v. Nooth
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.
This case requires us to interpret a provision of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA), ORS 138.510 to 138.680. ORS 138.580 requires that a petitioner seeking relief under that act attach to the petition “[affidavits, records or other documentary evidence supporting the allegations of the petition ***.” We conclude that that statute requires a petitioner to attach materials, including the petitioner’s own averments of fact, that address each element of each asserted ground for relief and that, if presumed true, would permit the post-conviction court to determine that the petitioner was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. PayneOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Eklof v. StewardOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Giron-CortezOregon Supreme Court · 2024
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.