Legal Opinion
State v. Ruud
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 21, 1977No. 47030PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Defendants, Norma Ruud, her husband Royce Ruud, and Willmar Nursing Home, Inc., appeal from conviction by a jury for theft, Minn.St. 609.52, subd. 2(3); 609.05, and presenting false claims to a public body, Minn.St. 609.465; 609.05. Norma and Royce were each fined $7,500 and placed on probation. The nursing home was fined $10,000. We affirm.
Defendants Norma and Royce Ruud own and operate defendant Willmar Nursing Home. Royce Ruud is president of the nursing home; Norma is secretary-treasur er and administrator. The cost of nursing home care for eligible welfare recipients is…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. KuhnauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. StrimlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. AuchampachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.