Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Strimling

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 10, 1978No. 47542, 47543PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

Defendants Bertram M. Strimling and P. George Hedlund are longtime partners who have jointly owned and operated a number of business entities in the health care industry. As a result of an investigation into the books and records of the River Villa Conva*425lescent Medicenter (River Villa), owned by defendants, both men were indicted by a Hennepin County grand jury. Strimling was charged with two counts of violating Minn.St. 609.465, and with two counts of violating Minn.St. 300.60. Hedlund was charged with one count on each of the same two offenses. The case was tried to a jury,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. State v. NutleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. State v. RuudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. State v. OeveringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. McClure v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API