Legal Opinion

State v. Kuhnau

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 1, 2001No. C2-99-160PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

This appeal involves our review of a jury instruction given in a trial on a charge of conspiracy to commit the crime of first-degree sale of the controlled substance methamphetamine. Appellant Timothy Warren Kuhnau alleges error because the conspiracy instruction given at trial did not include all the elements of the substantive crime that was the object of the conspiracy. The instruction omitted the words “when Mr. Kuhnau knew or believed that the substance sold was methamphetamine.” This specific language was, however, included in the instructions given for the three…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. ShoopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. RuudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. State v. BlasusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Sisson v. TriplettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. State v. KoppiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. State v. VanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. George v. Estate of BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API