Legal Opinion
State v. Hannuksela
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 16, 1990No. C4-89-1065PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
Appellant Dennis Hannuksela on appeal from his conviction for the first degree murder of Arthur Nelson seeks a new trial for alleged trial court error in: (1) failing to suppress evidence seized by police pursuant to an alleged invalid general warrant, (2) violating his statutory marital communication privilege by permitting his ex-wife to testify about appellant’s acts and gestures observed by her during the marriage, and (3) in admitting evidence of two prior aggravated forgeries committed by him. We affirm the conviction.
Arthur Nelson, a retired widower who worked as a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. NessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.