Legal Opinion
Damon v. Unisys Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 13, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-B-312PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendant Unisys Corporation (Unisys) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on plaintiffs claim under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(c). I have jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e). The material facts are undisputed. Because I conclude that plaintiffs claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, I will grant Unisys’ motion.
I
Plaintiff James R. Damon (Damon) seeks the statutory penalty under ERISA § 1132(e) for defendant’s alleged failure to provide information pursuant to 29…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reed v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Harless v. Research Institute of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Brooks v. Metrica, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Burke v. GregoryDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- Middleton v. Russell Group, Ltd.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.