Legal Opinion
Middleton v. Russell Group, Ltd.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided April 12, 1996No. 2:95CV00630PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
SHARP, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the Rule 12(b) motion of Defendants The Russell Group, Ltd. and Brooke Licensing to dismiss this action on grounds that it was filed outside the applicable statute of limitations period. 1 The Middletons oppose the motion, and the court heard the oral argument of counsel on March 25, 1996. Upon careful review of the issue before it, the court determines that Defendants’ statute of limitations defense is not well-taken and the motion to dismiss on that ground should be denied.
On August 28,1995, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Donald Law v. Ernst & Young, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Jo Ann Johnson v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Glavor v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Sandra THEARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLAXO, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harless v. Research Institute of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Gasper v. EIDP, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024