Legal Opinion

Valley Knitting Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 8, 1960No. Reap. Dec. 9627; Entry No. 44846, etcPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The four appeals for reappraisement here involved, which have been consolidated for purposes of trial, raise the question of whether certain inland charges included in the f.o.b. price of men’s, boys’, and infants’ cotton wear, exported from Japan, are properly to be considered part of the value of such merchandise.

The articles covered by each of these appeals were appraised at their respective invoice unit values net packed. Although the fact is not formally so stated in the official papers, which are in evidence in this case, or in the record, it may be assumed that the appraiser…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BrechnerUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Robertson v. BradburySupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Supreme Merchandise Co.United States Customs Court · 1962
  2. United States v. Gitkin Co.United States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API