Legal Opinion

United States v. Gitkin Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided June 5, 1961No. A.R.D. 132; Entry No. 15207-1/2, etcPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

This is an application for review of the decision and judgment of a single judge sitting in reappraisement (43 Cust. Ct. 508, Reap. Dec. 9524). Tbe merchandise, the subject of this proceeding, consists of bamboo draperies, curtains, blinds, and blind material, exported from Japan during the years 1956 and 1957. Seventy appeals for reappraisement, covering the involved shipments, have been herein consolidated.

It appears from the record, and the individual invoices which are in evidence as plaintiff’s collective exhibit 2, that all of the importations were entered at the invoiced…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. BrechnerUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. United States v. Case & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Valley Knitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. United States v. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Supreme Merchandise Co.United States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Lollytogs, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. United States v. Knit WitsUnited States Customs Court · 1969

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API