Legal Opinion

Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 6, 1965No. Reap. Dec. 10942; Entry Nos. 36022; 37281PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The two appeals for reappraisement here involved have been consolidated for purposes of trial. They relate to two importations of Japanese cotton hooked rugs which were invoiced and entered at $0.14 per square foot, plus labels and packing, but appraised at $0.17 per square foot, net, packed.

It is not disputed that export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1980, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper statutory basis of appraisement. Said provision and the definitions of certain terms therein read as follows:

Export Value. — Eor the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. BrechnerUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. United States v. Supreme Merchandise Co.United States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Valley Knitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. United States v. Acme Steel Co.United States Customs Court · 1963
  5. Brechner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lollytogs, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Ellis Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Concord Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API