Legal Opinion

Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 15, 1964No. Reap. Dec. 10825; Entry No. 108893, etcPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foud, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof, which have been consolidated for the purpose of trial, raise the question of whether certain inland charges and buying commissions are properly considered to be part of the dutiable value of the merchandise before the court.

The merchandise consists of cotton poplin brassieres which do not appear to be enumerated on the final list of the Secretary of the Treasury, T JD. 54521. Appraisement was made under section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. BrechnerUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. United States v. Gitkin Co.United States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Valley Knitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lollytogs, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. United States v. Knit WitsUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Brentwood Originals v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Reliance International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API