Legal Opinion

Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 12, 1965No. Reap. Dec. 11056; Entry No. 704803PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement of an importation of men’s cotton dress and sport shirts from Hong Kong. The various items of merchandise involved in the present shipment were entered at their invoice unit prices per dozen, which prices were exclusive of handling and freight charges. They were appraised at f.o.b. unit prices per dozen which, as will be amplified, infra, were approximately 2.3 per centum more than the invoiced ex-factory prices.

It is not disputed that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Muser v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. BrechnerUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. United States v. Supreme Merchandise Co.United States Customs Court · 1962
  4. United States v. Gitkin Co.United States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Valley Knitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Picard v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Brentwood Originals v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Reliance International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Carolina Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API