Legal Opinion
State v. Marty
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 12, 1985No. C4-85-666PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Criminal defendant appeals his conviction, claiming that he was denied a fair trial. We agree, and reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
The appellant, Joseph Marty, has a long record of alcohol-related driving offenses. On August 9, 1984, at about 1:30 a.m., appellant entered the house of his es tranged wife in violation of a restraining order.
Appellant’s wife, Ann Marty, called the Cottage Grove police to complain. She told the police dispatcher that her husband was at her house in violation of the restraining order. While they were speaking, appellant left the house.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. BerkelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. ReardonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. KilkerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989