State v. Berkelman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of the gross misdemeanor offense of driving with a blood alcohol concentration of .10 or more within 5 years of a prior conviction under the DWI statute,1 and was sentenced by the trial court to 6 months in jail, with execution of the term stayed pending appeal. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his prior conviction because (a) a prior conviction is not an element of the offense of aggravated DWI and (b) in any event his offer to stipulate to the prior conviction eliminated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. McAllisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. NicholsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MurrayHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. DettmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.