Legal Opinion

State v. Berkelman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 21, 1984No. C9-83-559PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of the gross misdemeanor offense of driving with a blood alcohol concentration of .10 or more within 5 years of a prior conviction under the DWI statute,1 and was sentenced by the trial court to 6 months in jail, with execution of the term stayed pending appeal. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his prior conviction because (a) a prior conviction is not an element of the offense of aggravated DWI and (b) in any event his offer to stipulate to the prior conviction eliminated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. State v. McAllisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. SaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. MurrayHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. State v. DettmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API