Legal Opinion
State v. Larson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 12, 1989No. C2-88-2379PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
After a jury trial, appellant was found guilty of second degree criminal sexual conduct involving his daughter. Appellant alleges that he was convicted based on the trial court’s improper admission of his daughter’s out-of-court statements and insufficient evidence. We remand.
FACTS
Following marriage dissolution proceedings, appellant’s three-year-old daughter B.L.L. remained in her mother’s custody, subject to visitation by appellant. In late April, 1987, B.L.L. complained to her mother of being sore. B.L.L. was taken to a clinic where a medical assistant tested and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990