Legal Opinion

State v. Braun

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 1984No. C3-84-616PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

CERTIFIED QUESTION: May the State offer to the jury evidence of defendant’s prior D.W.I. conviction as an element of a gross misdemeanor prosecution under Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1982)?

I

Braun was charged with a gross misdemeanor under the enhancement provision of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 3(a) (1982) based on prior D.W.I. convictions. Braun is willing to stipulate to the prior convictions to remove them from jury consideration. The State insists on its right to present to the jury evidence of prior convictions notwithstanding the offer to stipulate.

In State v. Berkelman,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. BerkelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. F. & H. Investment Co. v. Sackman-Gilliland Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. State v. MunnellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Gruening v. PinottiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API