Legal Opinion

State v. Reardon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1955No. 36,539PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

The defendant was indicted for first degree grand larceny under M. S. A. 622.01(2) and 622.05(3). Following conviction and imposition of sentence, the trial court denied defendant’s motion for a new trial. From this order the defendant has appealed.

Since the one question for consideration is whether the defendant was denied his constitutional right to a fair trial, the facts are briefly set forth only to place the issue in context. The defendant, a realtor doing business in the city of St. Paul as the Reardon Service Bureau, sold a house for the complainant, Alva P. Broeker.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. State v. WoffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. State v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API