Legal Opinion

Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1976No. 504PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court to decide whether appellants have met the minimum requirements for maintaining a class action.

Appellants brought a class action pursuant to Pa.R.Civ. P. 2230, alleging that appellee had failed to record the satisfaction of mortgages as required by statute, and that it was therefore liable to pay the statutory penalty. 1 Appellee, contending that the action was not a proper class action, filed preliminary objections under Pa.R.Civ. P. 1017(b) (5). The lower court sustained the objections, dismissing the class aspects of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Klemow v. Time IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. LUITWEILER v. Northchester Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Debbs v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. D'AMELIO v. Blue Cross of Lehigh ValleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Cambanis v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. ABC Sewer Cleaning Co. v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API