Legal Opinion

D'AMELIO v. Blue Cross of Lehigh Valley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1985No. 01418PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant/plaintiffs’ motion for certification of a class action. The court below held that certification was not appropriate because plaintiffs failed to satisfy the commonality, typicality and adequacy of representation requisites for certification pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1702. 1 We disagree and, therefore, reverse and remand to the Court of Common Pleas to make additional findings of fact necessary for a determination of whether class certification is appropriate.

I. FACTUAL HISTORY

The pertinent facts are as follows. Plaintiff, Larry…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Klemow v. Time IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Wolfson v. SolomonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  5. Ablin, Inc. v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Debbs v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. DiLucido v. Terminix International, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Weinberg v. Sun Company, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API