D'AMELIO v. Blue Cross of Lehigh Valley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant/plaintiffs’ motion for certification of a class action. The court below held that certification was not appropriate because plaintiffs failed to satisfy the commonality, typicality and adequacy of representation requisites for certification pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1702. 1 We disagree and, therefore, reverse and remand to the Court of Common Pleas to make additional findings of fact necessary for a determination of whether class certification is appropriate.
I. FACTUAL HISTORY
The pertinent facts are as follows. Plaintiff, Larry…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Klemow v. Time IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Wolfson v. SolomonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Ablin, Inc. v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Debbs v. Chrysler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- DiLucido v. Terminix International, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Weinberg v. Sun Company, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.