Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
Irving H. and Lillian Piltzer brought an action in equity in behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated against Independence Federal Savings & Loan Association. Plaintiffs alleged that they were mortgagors of Independence Federal, and that the defendant’s practice of requiring its mortgagors to escrow taxes, water rents, and insurance premiums either constituted a breach of an express trust, violated a con*404structive trust relationship, or amounted to a contract of adhesion.
After an answer was filed, discovery conducted, and certain facts stipulated,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Brisco HUFF, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. N. D. CASS COMPANY OF ALABAMA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Sullivan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Miller v. Mackey International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Lilian v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.