Legal Opinion

Debbs v. Chrysler Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 2002PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLally-Green, J.

¶ 1 In this class action case, Appellant, Daimler Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”), appeals from the order entering judgment in favor of Appellee, Louise Crawley (“Crawley”) and the class. Craw-ley filed a cross-appeal. For the reasons discussed below, we vacate the judgment and remand for decertification of the class.

I. Facts and Procedural History

¶ 2 A careful examination of the record reveals the following facts. The present litigation has spanned approximately twelve years and has been overseen by three judges of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. 1 We address the facts in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Werwinski v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Hunt v. United States Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API