Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Luna v. Huffman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1996No. 95-1962PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

In his sole proposition of law, Luna asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his mandamus action. More particularly, Luna claims that the judges of the court of appeals and the justices of this court are biased against him because they are of German and Celtic descent and he is not. Luna contends that representative government should be abolished, and that all laws should be put to a general vote by the électorate. According to Luna, he would prefer that “the entire population [rule on his legal actions rather] than a German Judge with absolute dictatorial powers * * *.”

While…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sherrills v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Peeples v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Fain v. Summit County Adult Probation DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Jennings v. NurreOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Tillimon v. WeiherOhio Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Thompson v. SponOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Nalls v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Nalls v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. United Auto Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Atkins v. HooverOhio Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API