Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Peeples v. Anderson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1995No. 95-525PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

In his first proposition of law, Peeples contends that federal constitutional rights to due process and prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment require prison officials to provide prisoners with medical tests which are reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis of infectious diseases where there is evidence of possible transmission during a prison altercation.

While sua sponte dismissal of a complaint without notice is generally inappropriate, it is proper where the complaint is frivolous or the claimant obviously cannot prevail on the facts alleged in the complaint. See State ex rel. Edwards…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Forrest Gene English v. William J. CowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Fattlar v. BoyleOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. McGinty v. Cleveland City School District BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Woods v. SharkinOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API