Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Tillimon v. Weiher

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1992No. 92-1835PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

According to O’Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc. (1975), 42 Ohio St.2d 242, 71 O.O.2d 223, 327 N.E.2d 753, syllabus:

“In order for a court to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted * * *, it must appear beyond doubt from the complaint that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts entitling him to recovery. (Conley v. Gibson [1957], 355 U.S. 41 [78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80], followed).”

We hold that Tillimon can prove no set of facts entitling him to relief and affirm the dismissal of the complaint.

First, Tillimon demands that we order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Stanley v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. City of Middleburg Heights v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. RobbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Sherrills v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Dehler v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Sherrills v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. RobbOhio Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API