Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Tillimon v. Weiher
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1992No. 92-1835PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
According to O’Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc. (1975), 42 Ohio St.2d 242, 71 O.O.2d 223, 327 N.E.2d 753, syllabus:
“In order for a court to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted * * *, it must appear beyond doubt from the complaint that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts entitling him to recovery. (Conley v. Gibson [1957], 355 U.S. 41 [78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80], followed).”
We hold that Tillimon can prove no set of facts entitling him to relief and affirm the dismissal of the complaint.
First, Tillimon demands that we order…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Stanley v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Middleburg Heights v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. RobbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Sherrills v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Dehler v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Sherrills v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. RobbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.