Legal Opinion

State ex rel. United Auto Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2002No. 2000-0886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 408.] THE STATE EX REL. UNITED AUTO AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. OHIO BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as State ex rel. United Auto Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp.,

2002-Ohio-2491.] Workers’ compensation—In the absence of a rule promulgated pursuant to procedures in R.C. Chapter 119, the Administrator of Workers’ Compensation is without authority to refund or reduce premiums pursuant to R.C. 4123.32(A). (No.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Kent Elastomer Prods., Inc. v. LogueOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. State ex rel. Martens v. Findlay Mun. CourtOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State ex rel. Martens v. Findlay Mun. CourtOhio Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API