Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Thompson v. Spon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1998No. 98-505PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant and the various amici curiae assert that the court of appeals erred in sua sponte dismissing the mandamus complaint. Sua sponte dismissal of a complaint is appropriate if the complaint is frivolous or the claimant obviously cannot prevail on the facts alleged in the complaint. State ex rel. Luna v. Huffman (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 486, 487, 659 N.E.2d 1279, 1280; State ex rel. Fogle v. Steiner (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 158, 161, 656 N.E.2d 1288, 1292. Consequently, we must determine whether appellant’s mandamus claim is frivolous or obviously without merit. Luna and Fogle, supra.

Appellant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. KeenanOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. GreerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Heffelfinger v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Bruggeman v. IngrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Arrington v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State ex rel. Mackey v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API