Legal Opinion
Dilley v. Alexander
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 15, 1980No. Nos. 77-1789, 77-1790, 77-1791 and 77-1792PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MacKINNON.
MacKINNON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Michael F. Dilley, et al., move this court for clarification of the opinion of February 26, 1979,1 reversing the district court and holding the Army’s Selection Board to have been constituted in direct violation of the statute. We ordered that appellants be reinstated to active duty and that the Army consider them for promotion by two promotion selection boards constituted in accordance with applicable laws.
Appellants’ motion for clarification asserts that the Army has taken the position that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Follette v. BurgosSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Federal Power Commission, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Yee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Dilley v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Barnick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Robert F. Christian, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Bobby Goble v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of the Army Frank J. Preston v. John O. Marsh, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Craton Liddell v. State of Missouri, Craton Liddell v. City of St. Louis, Plaintiff-Intervenor/appellant. In Re City of St. Louis, Paul Berra and Ronald A. LeggettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.