Dilley v. Alexander
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by MacKINNON, Circuit Judge.
MacKINNON, Circuit Judge:
Section 266 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code provides that each board convened for the promotion of officers in the United States Army Reserve shall include an appropriate *334number of Reserve officers. Appellants are commissioned officers in the Army Reserve who were serving on active duty until early 1977. Between January and April of that year, they were involuntarily released from active duty because they were not selected (passed over) for temporary promotion to the next highest grade by two successive promotion…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- John F. Kreis v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Stuart Sargisson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Hardison v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Pamela Lea Maier v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- William v. Wenger v. Paul D. Monroe, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Adjutant General of the California National Guard California National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.