Legal Opinion
Yee v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 19, 1975No. 449-73PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ktxnzig,
Judge, delivered the opinion of the court:
The primary question before us in this military pay case is whether the failure of the Air Force Board for the Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) to remove promotion pass overs from plaintiff’s record was arbitrary and capricious.1 A secondary question concerns the Air Force Accounting and Finance Center and whether it improperly offset civilian earnings in computing plaintiff’s back pay and allowances after his erroneous discharge in 1965.
As to the primary issue, we hold the action of the AFBCMR to have been arbitrary and capricious.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Richard A. Weiss v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Brenner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Caddington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Skaradowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- David C. Roth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Edward Larry Dodson v. United States Government, Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.