Legal Opinion

Watson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1987No. 13796, 13815, 83-996, 83-1136 and 83-1150PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Senior Judge:

This case is before us en banc on a claim by appellant of ineffective assistance of counsel on his previous direct appeal from his conviction. It was heard previously before a division of this court, (Watson v. United States, 508 A.2d 75 (D.C.), reh’g granted, judgment vacated, 514 A.2d 800 (D.C.1986)), and when the court decided to hear the case en banc, the opinion of the hearing division was automatically vacated in accordance with our usual procedures.1 Also involved are appeals from trial court orders dealing with issues of ineffectiveness of trial counsel and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Williams v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  3. Gary E. Byrd v. John S. Henderson and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Rothering v. Mc CaughtryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API