Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Federal Power Commission, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 1, 1977No. 73-1282PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:
This litigation confronts us a second time. On its first appearance in this court, we held that the Federal Power Commission erred in adopting a schedule of rates filed by Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI), a public electric utility, without resolving the persisting claim of its municipal customer, the City of Cleveland, Ohio, that the rates exceeded those to which the parties had previously agreed for service to be supplied to the City. 1 Our mandate directed further proceedings by the Commission, 2 and a controversy now rages over the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Food Store Employees Union, Local 347Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- United States v. Richard Harmon BellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Bernard Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Dolen E. Lindsey, Cross-Appellee v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Ronald ThrasherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.