Lozoff v. Kaisershot
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. Defense by representation in an action for declaratory judgment. Sec. 260.12, Stats., provides that “when the parties are very numerous and it may be impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or more may sue or defend for the benefit of the whole.”
The parties defending for the class must have a right or interest in common with the persons represented, and must fairly represent the interest or right involved so that the issue may be fairly and honestly tried. Pipkorn v. Brown Deer (1960), 9 Wis. (2d) 571, 577, 101 N. W. (2d) 623. The question of whether it is impracticable to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Town of Blooming Grove v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- White House Milk Co. v. ThomsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Wisconsin Pharmaceutical Asso. v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Joyce v. FarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Pipkorn v. Village of Brown DeerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Goebel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Schlosser v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Kilvington v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Hutchinson & Southern Railroad v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Milwaukee Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 215 v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.