Legal Opinion

White House Milk Co. v. Thomson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1957PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

Sec. 100.22, Stats., which the plaintiff seeks to have declared unconstitutional, is a criminal statute which prohibits a purchaser of milk, cream, or butterfat from paying different prices for such products in different communities of the state, unless justified by a commensurate difference in quantity or quality, or in transportation charges or other expense of marketing involved in the purchase. It is apparent from the express wording of the statute that its purpose is to prevent unfair discrimination in the purchase of such dairy products between different communities or sections of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Town of Blooming Grove v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. Westlake v. District Court of First Judicial District Ex Rel. Lewis & Clark CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Muscoda Bridge Co. v. Worden-Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. State v. City of Oak CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Barry Laboratories, Inc. v. State Board of PharmacyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Town of Blooming Grove v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API