Legal Opinion

Goebel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1978No. 76-074PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The facts in the case are not in dispute. Although First Federal is a federally regulated institution, see: Kaski v. First Fed. S. & L. Asso. of Madison, 72 Wis.2d 132, 240 N.W.2d 367 (1976), the resolution of the instant controversy depends on the interpretation of the note and mortgage as a matter of state contract law.

On May 29, 1964, the plaintiffs, as mortgagors, executed a mortgage in favor of First Federal, as mortgagee, in the amount of $17,000, with interest at six percent annually, payable in monthly installments.

The note contained the following interest rate adjustment provision:

“.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wisconsin Wire WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Schlosser v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Moran v. ShernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Kaski v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cope v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Crown Life Insurance v. LaBonteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API