Legal Opinion
Wisconsin Pharmaceutical Asso. v. Lee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1953PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
A portion of the memorandum opinion of the trial judge reads as follows:
“The issues raised are whether the complaint states a cause of action and whether there is a defect in parties defendant.
“The case of State ex rel. La Follette v. Dammann, 220 Wis. 17, 264 N. W. 627, sets forth the nature of the essential facts that must appear:
“ ‘The requisite precedent facts or conditions which courts generally hold must exist in order that declaratory relief may be obtained may be summarized as follows:
“‘(1) There must exist a justiciable controversy — that is to say, a controversy in which a claim of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Joyce v. FarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Madison v. WisowatyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Riebs Co. v. MortensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wisconsin Collectors Asso. v. Thorp Finance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Cartwright v. SharpeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Menzl v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Pension Management, Inc. v. DuRoseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- People Ex Rel. Inter-Church Temperance Movement v. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.