Legal Opinion

Town of Blooming Grove v. City of Madison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1957PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.

At the outset we confront a number of preliminary and procedural objections to the propriety of deciding the case on the merits, which are advanced by the city. We consider, as did the circuit judge, that none of them is well taken and that the merits are properly before us. On the merits, we hold that the annexation ordinance is void because of failure to comply with the requirements of sec. 62.07 (1) (b), Stats. 1953, relating to publication of the proposed ordinance in advance of its adoption.

1. The city contends that the interest of the town had ceased to exist before judgment, and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Town of Madison v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. McLoughlin v. MalnarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Village of Brown Deer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Popenfus v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Bechthold v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Heck & Paetow Claim Service, Inc. v. HeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Barry Laboratories, Inc. v. State Board of PharmacyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. St. Augustine School v. Jill UnderlyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API