Legal Opinion

Hunt Ex Rel. Hunt v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 9, 2008No. 06 Civ. 170(SAS), 06 Civ. 213(SAS), 06 Civ. 6347(SAS)PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Enzo Biochem, Inc. (“Enzo” or the “Company”), a public company incorporated in 1970, has been engaged in the research and development of treatments to fight the human immunodeficiency virus (“HIV”) and other disease. Plaintiffs are individuals who invested in Enzo securities. Defendants include the Company, several officers and directors, and an outside consultant. 1 Plaintiffs allege that they suffered financial losses by relying on defendants’ misstatements and omissions when deciding to purchase, hold, and sell Enzo…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Ellington Credit Fund, Ltd. v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. RSM PRODUCTION CORP. v. FridmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. 380544 Canada, Inc. v. Aspen Technology, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API